Here is a story from Indiana about the murder of two people who allegedly were confidential informants. While the criminal investigation is ongoing, there needs to be another investigation to identify how these two people were outed as informants, if indeed they were. If lessons are to be learned this investigation needs to be carried out by persons suitably trained and experienced from outside the law enforcement agency where the people were registered as informants
Human source/ agent Confidential Informant Case law Canada
Police corruption and informants - too close for comfort
Here is a story form Arkansas about a sheriff who may have gotten too close to his informant. Managing confidential informants is a high risk business. Many officers have no idea how easily they can find themselves being corrupted. There is often an unhealthy combination of ignorance and hubris. Add this to lack of structures within an agency and poor supervision and it is a recipe for disaster.
Only members who have completed Department approved training may utilize confidential informants or maintain informant files
I was doing some doing some research on the web when I came across this quote “Only members who have completed Department approved training may utilize confidential informants or maintain informant files”. It is taken from Vancouver Police Department’s Informant Management Policy For those of you unaware Vancouver is a big city in Canada - think mountains and sea, with approximately 2000 sworn and unsworn members.
The cost of poor confidential informant management - Invest now or Pay later.
Sometimes it is hard to get through to people how costly the mismanagement of confidential informants can be. This story relates to a police department that have paid out over $2.3 million dollars with a third case pending. That is a lot of money for any department to be paying out. And it could have been avoided if the department had invested in the proper structures for managing confidential informants.
Confidential Informant corruption. Patterns of behavior and Prevention
Here are two stories about alleged corruption involving confidential informants, one in Pennsylvania and one in Kentucky Both questions beg the question as to who was supervising these officers? This article explores patterns of behavior in informant management that lead to corruption and suggests ways to prevent it. Will be of interest to anyone involved in a drugs task force.
Avoiding confidential informant related corruption.
There have been serious allegations of corruption in Detroit Police Department involving a narcotics unit and the mismanagement of confidential informant finances. There are always risks when it comes to managing confidential informants (HUMINT, Human Sources, Covert Human Intelligence Sources) This article discusses some of the ways to manage these risks.
Confidential Informants Review of Houston Police Narcotics Unit
HUMINT and CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT and HUMAN SOURCE and CHIS - The best training available
Confidential Informant Book - The Human Source Management System
Advanced confidential informant training
The Use and Control of Informants: A Patrol Officer's Primer
What makes a confidential informant credible?
‘What makes a confidential informant credible/’ may seem like an easy question to answer but it is not. First, we need to understand what credible actually means in legal terms. Second, we have to realise who is making the judgement about credibility. Third, we have to understand what information can be used to make an informed decision with regard to credibility.
When it comes to meaning if we look to the dictionary it gives: ‘Someone who's credible is honest and believable.’ This is little help because few people are honest all the time, and while we may be speaking the truth, the way we speak that truth means that we won’t be believed. Defining credible and credibility is not that simple.
Who must be convinced with regard to credibility: first the officer receiving the information but how many of those officers realise that how difficult it is for them to be objective about what they are being told. How many of them know anything about cognitive biases that distort are decision making? How many managers that are deploying resources based on information from an informant understand what makes information credible. And when it comes to a court deciding if an informant is credible… in many cases they merely take the word of an untrained officer.
Deciding if an informant’s information is credible requires the adoption of a systematic approach to processing the information with built in checks and balances to test it at every stage. And just because information from an informant is credible one time does not make the informant credible all the time.
This is just a teaser for how officers need to think about credibility when it comes to managing an informant. Ant this is why they need to be properly trained - not a one day seminar. Managing informants requires specialised training. If they have not had it and if the training does not cover this topic in detail one should always be doubtful about using any information they get from a confidential informant.
If you have any queries about this please get in touch. Or take a look at our publication: https://www.amazon.com/Managing-Intelligence-Guide-Enforcement-Professionals/dp/1466586427
Problems with confidential informants
There has been a lot of reporting recently about law enforcement agencies having problems managing confidential informants. Regardless of how you refer to people who confidentially pass information to law enforcement.managing them is often problematic. There are numerous terms that are often used: Covert human intelligence sources (CHIS), the UK legal term, Human sources, used by FBI and widely in Canada and across Australia. and HUMINT often used within military circles. Having a clear definition of what constitutes an informant and what the parameters of their role is are critical elements in managing these individuals effectively. A lot of law enforcement officers believe that anyone can manage informants which is also one of the reasons that an agency gets into trouble around informant management. And unfortunately when something goes wrong the default setting for many is to blame an individual rather than looking at the system that created the circumstances where the bad things happened. The vast majority of things that go wrong with managing informants are down to how the agency manages the informant and the systems that are in place. Most of the time it is an officer being scapegoated. Undoubtedly there are officers who have been involved in wrongdoing but when one drills down into the case it is the informant management system within the agency that has condone the activity or not prevented the wrong doing.
Fortunately, there is a lot an agency can do to mange risks around informant management. At HSM Training and Consultancy we have the knowledge and skills to identify the problems you may have within your agency and advise with regard to steps that need to be taken to protect the agency, the public and the informant. In many cases we can help minimise the impact where something bad has already happened. We are professionals. We know informant management inside out. We literally wrote the book!
So regardless of the size of your agency get in touch and we can have a chat about how we can help you. We work with both big and small agencies. And we want what is right for you. Its not an one size fits all solution. And if you need expert testimony about what is good and bad practice with regard to managing informants we can provide that
